Holzweg hat geschrieben:Ich poste im Gegenzug, wie sich dein Murks von meiner Warte aus darstellt.
Na, wenn du erst wüsstest wie sich dein Murks aus meiner Warte darstellt (:
Deine Beiträge so sehend wie du meine gerne sehen würdest,
Holzweg hat geschrieben:Ich poste im Gegenzug, wie sich dein Murks von meiner Warte aus darstellt.
Holzkopf hat geschrieben:Fussball, Eishockey, Hotdogwettfressen, Brüllrülpswettbewerbe, etc.
USAF hat geschrieben:Taken in total, our potential adversaries can create a nearly impenetrable box that our legacy fighters can not enter, thus denying us air supremacy. Without air supremacy we lose the most powerful edge we hold on the modern battlefield today. We can no longer operate with impunity against the very latest integrated threads. Remember: there is no price for second best!
Highway hat geschrieben:lololol gelb lololol grün
USAF hat geschrieben:Today our legacy fighters are being outmatched by the latest russian and chinese fighters. As you can clearly see there is basically no distinct fourth generation advantage we hold. Russia is at the forefront of advanced fighter technology.
Holzweg hat geschrieben:Die russischen Kampfflugzeuge sind offenbar so toll, dass sogar die Türkei die ohne Probleme vom Himmel holen kann, wie vor ca. einem halben Jahr demonstriert!
hat geschrieben:Russland wird langsam aber sicher trocken gelegt.
hat geschrieben:Du kannst ja nicht lesen, geschweigen denn verstehen
hat geschrieben:Eurofighter
hat geschrieben:F35?
hat geschrieben:
- Current aircraft software is inadequate for even basic pilot training.
- Ejection seat may fail, causing pilot fatality.
- Several pilot-vehicle interface issues, including lack of feedback on touchscreen controls.
- The radar performs poorly, or not at all.
- Engine replacement takes an average of 52 hours, instead of the two hours specified.
- Maintenance tools do not work
- usw. usf.
hat geschrieben:Das hat wahrscheinlich auch so'n yyy geschrieben
hat geschrieben:
- The F-35 has a significant risk of fire due to extensive fuel tank vulnerability, lightning vulnerability, and its OBIGGS system's inability to sufficiently reduce fire-sustaining oxygen, despite redesigns;
- Wing drop concerns are still not resolved after six years, and may only be mitigated or solved at the expense of combat maneuverability and stealth;
- The June engine problems are seriously impeding or preventing the completion of key test points;
- Even in its third iteration, the F-35’s helmet continues to show high false-alarm rates and computer stability concerns, seriously reducing pilots’ situational awareness and endangering their lives in combat;
- The number of Block 2B’s already limited combat capabilities being deferred to later blocks means that the Marine Corps’ FY2015 IOC squadron will be even less combat capable than originally planned;
- ALIS software failures continue to impede operation, mission planning, and maintenance of the F-35, forcing the Services to be overly reliant on contractors and "unacceptable workarounds";
- Deficiencies in Block 2B software, and deferring those capabilities to later blocks, is undermining combat suitability for all three variants of the F-35;
- The program’s attempts to save money now by reducing test points and deferring crucial combat capabilities will result in costly retrofits and fixes later down the line, creating a future unaffordable bow wave that, based on F-22 experience, will add at least an additional $67 billion in acquisition costs; and
- Low availability and reliability of the F-35 is driven by inherent design problems that are only becoming more obvious and difficult to fix.
Mitglieder in diesem Forum: 0 Mitglieder und 5 Gäste